[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compilation error
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: compilation error |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:44:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> But, at the same time, you want to encourage people to submit
> documentation patches (and other patches) and it's certainly
> a big advantage if it's easy for them to build the documentation
> after a change to see what it looks like before they submit the
> patches.
You are right. Maybe we are sending conflicting messages: do not
compile Lily! Help us (with the docs), send patches!
What to do? Maybe we should just change the 'do not compile' attitude
a bit, and have 'supported' development platforms with a detailed
recipe to compile lily. The contributers of binary releases should
make sure that the recipe stays up to date. Would this work?
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: compilation error, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/03/01
- Re: compilation error, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/03/01
- Re: compilation error, Reuben Thomas, 2004/03/01
- Re: compilation error, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/03/01
- Re: compilation error, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/03/02
- Re: compilation error,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: compilation error, Aredridel, 2004/03/05
- Re: compilation error, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/03/10
- Re: compilation error, Edward Sanford Sutton, III, 2004/03/12
- Re: compilation error, Edward Sanford Sutton, III, 2004/03/06
Re: compilation error, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/03/01
Re: compilation error, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/03/01