[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why not to implement everything in scheme?
From: |
Nicolas Sceaux |
Subject: |
Re: Why not to implement everything in scheme? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:37:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Bonjour Heikki!
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:01:17 +0200 (EET), tu as dit :
> Why not to implement everything in scheme and get rid of gcc -compiling of
> the
> source? Or, is it the lexical parser which forces the use of gcc?
I'm not sure that there will be pletor of volonteers for recoding
thousands of C++ LOC in whatever other language.
Besides, guile is not an option.
hmmm, thinking of it... I volonteer for LilyPond in Common Lisp!!!
cliclypond is so easier to pronounce.
:-)
nicolas