Re: lily in scm, using music variables

[Nicolas Sceaux]

Tue, 4 May 2004 20:13:41 +0200, Han-Wen a dit : 

 > address@hidden writes:
 >> A function was introduced, that can be useful for debugging or
 >> simply finding out how a music expression can be built

 > is it necessary to do in such a complex way? I would rather rewrite
 > the parser entry points so that

 >   #{ c4 $myMusic #}

 > becomes

 >      (let*
 >        ((parser (ly:clone-current-parser)))
 >        (ly:parser-define parser 'myMusic myMusic)
 >        (ly:parse-string parser "c4 \myMusic "))

 > Then it also works for non-Music objects and requires much less code.
 > That should be feasible, AFAICT. What do you think?

That would be cleaner and more robust indeed! (my suggestion was
stupid, dohh). I'll try something with that.

nicolas