Re: \notes \relative

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> On Tuesday 17 August 2004 00.46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > address@hidden writes:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > With 2.3.11, I understand that the notation \notes \relative c {..} is
> > > ambiguous. But I'm surprised that it even is forbidden.. is this
> > > intentional?
> >
> > Yes.  \notes is no longer necessary, and references to it will be
> > removed from the manual.
> 
> That's cool.. however I don't understand why "\notes {c}" is allowed while 
> "\notes \relative c {c}" is a syntax error. The \notes keyword can apparently 
> be left out in both cases.

we couldn't make the parser
grok

  \notes \relative { .. }

without ambiguities, so we've taken an alternative route.


-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen