[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested
From: |
Bertalan Fodor |
Subject: |
lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:12:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) |
Hello,
I've done a test. Lilypond seems working with tetex-tiny, but there is
still that ecrm1000 issue. I don't remember clearly what is the status
of this problem .Will you include ecrm1000 in tetex-tiny?
Tomorrow I will try build 2.4CVS against tetex-2.0
Bert
kpathsea: Running mktextfm ecrm1000
mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1;
nonstopmode; input ecrm1000
This is METAFONT, Version 2.71828 (Web2C 7.5.4)
(/var/cache/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/ecrm1000.mfkpathsea: Running
mktexmf exbase
???:1: I can't find file `exbase'.
l.1 if unknown exbase: input exbase
fi;
Please type another input file name
???:1: Emergency stop.
l.1 if unknown exbase: input exbase
fi;
Transcript written on ecrm1000.log.
mktextfm: `mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode;
input ecrm1000' failed to make ecrm1000.tfm.
kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log.
./morgenlied.tex:1430: Font T1/cmr/m/n/10=ecrm1000 at 10.0pt not
loadable: Metric (TFM) file not found.
<to be read again>
relax
l.1430 }
%
[1] )
(see the transcript file for additional information)
- lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested,
Bertalan Fodor <=
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/14
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/14
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/14
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/15
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/17
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/02/17
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/17
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/17
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/18
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/18