On 19-May-05, at 11:06 PM, Stephen wrote:
If Lilypond is meant to demonstrate the art of music engraving, if it
is meant to recapture a lost art as it was practiced before the
computer age, if it is meant to improve musical performances, then it
should educate the user rather than allow the user to dictate to it.
Meaning there is a downside to Lilypond being bigger and more powerful
and more responsive to the user's demands. The vast majority of the
time, bigger is better. But the average user may not be an expert
music engraver and would make mistakes if Lilypond let him.
Have you read some LaTeX manuals? If not, I highly recommend reading
one; have a look at the discussion about margins.
Changing the margins (at least, making it "1 inch" as is common in Word)
isn't
recommended from a typographical point of view. But many users want that
(at least when they first begin using LaTeX) -- including myself.
Mostly because
I was using it for university essays, and I knew that everybody else was
using
Word (with small margins) and I didn't want it to look as if I was
padding my
essays. :)
My point is that LaTeX lets the user do whatever he wants (including
shooting
himself in the foot), but the manual warns the user not to do so.
LilyPond should
do the same thing. Any education of the user should happen in the
manual. Now,
if you have any specific recommendations for user-education, please tell
me. I'm
always happy to include people's patches to the docs.
I don't see a clear definition of what constitutes an improvement of
Lilypond or statement of purpose other than what I read in the
introduction,
OK, that's enough.
LilyPond is an open-source project. The contributors, be it Han-Wen and
Jan working
on internals, Mats answering questions, or me writing docs, work on
whatever itch
they want to scratch. I'm currently editing the "basic notation"
chapter. Not because
I think that's what the docs need the most (that would probably be
clarifying the
"global issues" chapter), but because I'm a neat freak.
You may also want to read "Cathedral and the Bazaar", by ESR. That deals
with the whole "leadership" issue.
Which I don't understand, because I think it is more exciting to
develop a program which is more specific, rather than, say, a notation
program.
Patches, be it to documentation or code, are always appreciated. Let
your excitement run wild.
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel