Re: 3.5.1 Ancient notation template broken

[Juergen Reuter]

On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Graham Percival wrote:

> The ancient notation template seems to be using a percussion staff.  I can't
> see anything obviously wrong in the template; could somebody familiar
> with ancient notation look at it?

Indeed, the result looks quite broken.  AFAICS, the template looks ok. 
The only thing I can see that may rise a problem is that within the 
StaffGroup, there is no explicit "\new Staff", i.e. some default type of 
staff is automatically created.  I would have expected that the ordinary 
staff is the default, but maybe this has changed for 2.5.27?  If this is 
the case, then I think this behaviour should be fixed (or, if this 
behaviour is really intended, it should be documented).

Greetings,
Juergen


> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/ 
> Ancient-notation-templates.html
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel