[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc branching
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: doc branching |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:23:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) |
Graham Percival wrote:
In addition, if Erik's music streams are in place in 2.10, then users
who don't want to manually upgrade syntax on old completed files have
the option of using the streams (which is the whole point of them,
right?) If you look at it that way, wouldn't we be absolutely crazy to
release 3.0 instead of 2.10? :)
I'm in disagreement with Erik over this, as I think that people will
want to upgrade their .ly files, instead of upgrading machine generated
files which aren't editable. Note that the stream -> .ly conversion is
non-existent at present.
Then, when we gear up for 2.10 / 3.0 release, and you overwrite the
manual with the 2.8 version, and then distribute the 2.9 material over
the new manual.
Exactly! ... actually, this could work even better than I originally
thought -- if I only make changes to the 2.8 docs, I don't need to track
unstable lily (and its various little hiccups, like new functionality in
CVS and docs that I can't compile until a new unstable GUB release).
OK, sounds as if we have decided then :)
Just drop me a line when I should update lilypond.org with the latest
doc fixes.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
- Re: doc branching, (continued)
- Re: doc branching, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Graham Percival, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Pedro Kröger, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching, Graham Percival, 2006/04/05
- Re: doc branching,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: doc branching, Graham Percival, 2006/04/05
Re: doc branching, Cameron Horsburgh, 2006/04/08