[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Page and line penalties
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: Page and line penalties |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Apr 2006 23:52:56 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.3 |
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 20:02, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Juergen Reuter wrote:
> > Maybe I am totally wrong, but this discussion reminds me of an issue
> > that I raised on Nov 18, last year; see the thread starting here:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-11/msg00088.html
> >
> > I am mentioning this thread just in case that you are looking for
> > interesting test examples.
>
> This is really something different. To solve this, we should rather
> introduce some convexity in the penalties, so one perfect plus two
> extremes is much worse than three so-so lines.
In constrained-breaking, I use the square of the force rather than its
absolute value -- I made the change for precisely this reason.
- Re: Page and line penalties, Joe Neeman, 2006/04/06
- Re: Page and line penalties, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties, Joe Neeman, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties, Juergen Reuter, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties,
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: Page and line penalties, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties, Joe Neeman, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/09
- Re: Page and line penalties, David Feuer, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties, Joe Neeman, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties, Joe Neeman, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties, David Feuer, 2006/04/07
- Re: Page and line penalties, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/04/07
Re: Page and line penalties, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/04/07