Re: Backend and non-backend (was Re: Stencil bounding box)

[David Feuer]

On 5/4/06, Johannes Schindelin <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 3 May 2006, David Feuer wrote:

> > If we're looking to measure small changes, area of union minus area of
> > intersection, divided by the area of the union, would probably be
> > good.
>
> If a really nasty bug creeps in, which makes the new bounding box very
> tiny, but keeps the location, this distance will be about 100%.

Hm hm...  Dividing by the area of the union is bad.  Maybe divide by
the area of the old ones?

David