Re: softcoding accepts_list_

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

Erik Sandberg escreveu:
> hi,
>
> I'm attempting to softcode \accepts and friends. Should the order of \accepts 
> calls be significant in absence of appropriate \defaultchild? I.e., if we have
>
> \layout {
> \context {\Score  \accepts "Foo" \accepts "Bar" }
> \context {\name Foo \accepts "Baz" }
> \context {\name Bar \accepts "Baz" }
> }
>
> \new Score \new Baz { c d e }
>
> .. then the path to Baz is ambiguous. Should we ideally throw a warning and 
> randomly pick either foo or bar, or should the order be defined by the order 
> of the \accepts calls?

I think it's best to use both: \defaultchild   should always have 
preference, but in absence, the order is signifcant.


--

Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

LilyPond Software Design
 -- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com