[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git patch
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: git patch |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:27:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) |
Johannes Schindelin escreveu:
>> shows the diff of the change that he just introduced
>
> Okay. But you mean
>
> $ git commit --dry file1 file2...
>
> or
>
> $ git commit --dry -a
Well, --dry would be usable both with -a and file1, file2.
I agree with Jakub that --diff might be a better name, but it should
be part of git-commit command, rather than the git-diff.
> Or, you use the script git-hunk-commit.bash which I posted. Which reminds
> me: I wanted to rewrite it for you so it is more non-brand-new-bash
> friendly.
:)
that's really nice, but actually recording separate hunks is a bit of
a headache if you have to do it over the command line. Under darcs, I
always use darcsum in emacs. In git, I always use git-status.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: git patch, (continued)
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/05
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/05
- Re: git patch, Graham Percival, 2006/12/05
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/05
- Re: git patch, Graham Percival, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Jakub Narebski, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/12/06
- Re: git patch, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/06
Re: git patch, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/12/05
Re: git patch, John Mandereau, 2006/12/05