Trevor Bača wrote:
> On 12/14/06, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Joe Neeman wrote:
>> > Could you have a look at the section on skyline vertical placement
>> > that I wrote? I think, btw, that "skyline vertical placement"
>> isn't
>> > a good name for this node. The only reason I call it "skyline" in
>> > the first place is that it uses a skyline algorithm but that isn't
>> > really relevant for the user. Does anyone have a better idea
>> for the
>> > name?
>>
>> Having read the docs, how about "Vertical collision avoidance" ?
>
>
> Or even "Vertical optimization".
That doesn't tell me anything. I'd rather propose something like
"Tuning vertical positioning [of objects]".
I've never seen such interest in a discussion on choosing
two/three words in the manual.