On 1/26/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
Joe Neeman escreveu:
>
> I have all the page-breaking files with coverage around 90% now, but
> I'll try to improve it a bit more (btw, the reason
> page-turn-page-breaking.cc was so low is that I forgot to put a \book
> around the regression tests so the lilypond-book output skipped the
> page-breaking stuff. Oops).
>
We have Scheme coverage now as well. This shows that
layout-page-layout.scm.cov
(define (walk-paths done-lines best-paths current-lines last current-best
isn't covered. Can you also add a test that runs this old code? Or should
we scrap it?
How about if we keep it for one more stable release? I can add a short test.