[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
We have a name for them (Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond)
From: |
Paco Vila |
Subject: |
We have a name for them (Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond) |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:52:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
El Wed, 07 de Nov de 2007, a las 05:07:39AM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen dijo:
>
> The lack of a name for a 128th note would indicate that a 64th is a
> reasonable smallest note.
I beg your pardon because I've been away on travel. I know that the discussion
is over and I am not going to continue it.
But I have felt the necessity to say that in Spanish we have (at least so I was
teached) names for 1/128 and 1/256 notes, see links below. I cite
Wikipedia here only as an illustration.
The names are Garrapatea[1] and Semigarrapatea[2] Funny, aren't they?
[1]http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrapatea
[2]http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semigarrapatea
--
Francisco Vila Doncel. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, (continued)
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/11/07
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Ian Stirling, 2007/11/07
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/11/08
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Valentin Villenave, 2007/11/08
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Mark Knoop, 2007/11/08
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/11/08
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Graham Percival, 2007/11/08
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/11/08
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Graham Percival, 2007/11/09
- Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Trevor Bača, 2007/11/07
We have a name for them (Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond),
Paco Vila <=
Re: GPD: official shortest note in lilypond, Ralph Little, 2007/11/07