[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: s vs. \skip
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: s vs. \skip |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:47:49 +0100 |
Carl
I'll go along with that.
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl D. Sorensen" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:20 AM
Subject: s vs. \skip
In rewriting the docs on rests, I've come across s and \skip as ways to
generate musical durations with no printed output.
At one point in the docs, it indicates that both s and \skip can be used to
create "spacer rests".
My preference is to change the docs so that "s" creatses a spacer rest, but
\skip does not. \skip simply skips musical time. The justification for
this change is that \skip does not create any musical output if that's all
there is. In contrast, s causes Staff and Voice contexts to be created.
Please see the GDP section on skips
<http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Skips.html#Skips>
and let me know if those of you who are responsible for the code agree with
my statements.
I'd also like to get a better title than Skips. I think I'd prefer "Spacer
Rests" or "Invisible Rests".
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- s vs. \skip, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/06/15
- Re: s vs. \skip,
Trevor Daniels <=