[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency (was: grand predefined-com
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency (was: grand predefined-command thread) |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:15:35 +0200 |
2008/6/28 Valentin Villenave <address@hidden>:
> - Are you sure that the doc string is entered this way? I can't
> remember having seen this syntax in the Scheme sources...
I am just stupid. Please forget this sentence.
However, I still do think we need an integer rather than a number in
this function...
As for \octaveCheck: since Graham is planning to rename a bunch of
predefined commands soon, maybe it would be sensible to rename this
one at the same time (even though it's not a predef).
Cheers,
Valentin