Re: convert-ly madness on git

[Graham Percival]

On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:12:30 +0200
Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden> wrote:

> Am Sonntag, 6. Juli 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 10:31:59 +0200
> > > There's also this thing about #(set-octavation n) becoming
> > > \ottava #n that I really wish we include in 2.12... (just my
> > > $0.0002)
> >
> > Han-Wen gave good reasons against it.
> 
> Huh? Han-Wen gave good reasons not to pollute the parser with code to
> parse \ottava num (without the #, as opposed to using a music
> function, i.e. \ottava #num). However, I never intended to pollute
> the parser anyway, I simply implemented the music function to allow
> \ottava #num. I haven't heard any argument against that yet (but also
> no Okay yet...).

Sorry, I'm really scatter-brained these days.  You're totally
right.

Cheers,
- Graham