[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compile.itely placement
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: compile.itely placement |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:49:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) |
Graham Percival a écrit :
I'm not clear about this, either. Actually, if anything
introduction.itely is going to die entirely (as part of the
web-gop stuff).
All right. I can't work on GOP in the 4 coming weeks: I must work on
translaed documentation compilation by translating
node names in source files because the current system has too many bugs;
this alone is already a big task.
And I'm still playing with GUB3 (trying to build it with Python 3 now...).
compile.itely is slated to be removed from AU 1, so in the long
term I think it should be moved to devel/. However, in the short
term I really can't spend the effort requried to make everything
work, so I recommend waiting 1 or 2 months.
OK, in the meantime we at least don't have to worry about compilation
instructions duplicated in the sources.
Do you like the idea of separating compilation instructions for
self-builders and packagers (that must go
in INSTALL too) from instructions for Lily developers?
Cheers,
John