[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc.
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc. |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:54:44 -0700 (PDT) |
Mark Polesky wrote:
> Hopefully there are no more snafus, but I need you guys to test this.
> Let me know if you find any problems. I'd like to apply this if the
> developers approve.
In the file attached to the previous post
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-08/txtDIrSYMGg1c.txt
one small (but important) correction needs to be made.
In the definition for "move-arpeggio-to-this-context",
8 lines down, this line:
(let* ((Arpeggio (ly:context-grob-definition context 'Arpeggio))
should instead read:
(let* ((Arpeggio (ly:context-grob-definition parent 'Arpeggio))
Thanks to Jonathan Wilkes for catching this (on -user).
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-08/msg00059.html
Otherwise, does this look good?
- Mark
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., Mark Polesky, 2009/08/01
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., Mark Polesky, 2009/08/01
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., Mark Polesky, 2009/08/01
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc.,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., Mark Polesky, 2009/08/04
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., David Kastrup, 2009/08/04
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., Neil Puttock, 2009/08/04
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., Joe Neeman, 2009/08/04
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., Mark Polesky, 2009/08/05
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., Joe Neeman, 2009/08/06
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., Mark Polesky, 2009/08/06
- Re: cross-staff versions of \arpeggioArrowUp etc., Joe Neeman, 2009/08/06