[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff? |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:01:09 +0200 |
2009/8/5 Mark Polesky <address@hidden>:
> Looking at an example from Ted Ross (see attached png), I'm
> thinking that Dot_column_engraver may be better suited in the
> Voice context than in the Staff context.
Mark, can you make this change on your own, modify the documentation
accordingly (don't forget NEWS), and make sure it doesn't break
anything (esp. wrt regtests)? If you do all of this, I think it should
be safe for you to push the change (if any problem occurs later, it
will be trivial to revert the commit).
Regards,
Valentin
- Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/05
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, David Kastrup, 2009/08/05
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/05
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/05
- Unable to use git, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/05
- Re: Unable to use git, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/08/05
- Re: Unable to use git, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/05
- Re: Unable to use git, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/07
- Re: Unable to use git, Graham Percival, 2009/08/07
Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/08/05