[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:08:28 +0200 (CEST) |
> FWIW, I used to think that this would be a very important feature;
> now I'm not so sure. There are certainly a few cases (eg. slurs,
> hairpins, treble clefs) where having more accurate outlines would
> help.
It would also help in improved positioning of accidentals.
> But the list is fairly short: for most glyphs, a more accurate
> box wouldn't matter much.
I agree. However, we need a mechanism to improve the more critical
cases.
Werner
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, (continued)
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/11
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/11
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Valentin Villenave, 2009/08/14
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/08/12
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, David Kastrup, 2009/08/12
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/13
Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Patrick McCarty, 2009/08/11
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Joe Neeman, 2009/08/12
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, David Kastrup, 2009/08/14
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/08/14
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/14
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, David Kastrup, 2009/08/14
- Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/17
Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/12
Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/08/12