Re: is this code-style better? (more alphabetizing patches)

[Patrick McCarty]

On 2009-08-21, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Mark Polesky wrote:
> 
> > I made some changes to the code-style here. Let me know
> > if you guys think anything is better or worse. I'll
> > probably combine these into one patch.
> 
> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-08/msg00826.html)
> 
> Anyone?

I think it looks fine, Mark.

Optionally, for scm/script.scm, you could use the indent style from
scm/define-grobs.scm:

  '(
    ("accent"
     . (
        (avoid-slur . around)
        (padding . 0.20)
        (quantize-position . #t)
        (script-stencil . (feta . ("sforzato" .  "sforzato")))
        (side-relative-direction . -1)))

etc.

This can simplify the process of adding new scripts and/or properties
at a later point.


-Patrick