Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR 4 Scheme functions: Improve docstrings.

[Neil Puttock]

2009/8/23 Mark Polesky <address@hidden>:
> Okay to apply?

No, since you've changed the names of function arguments while leaving
the original names in the body of the function:

-          2, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM name),
-          "Return the definition of @var{name} (a symbol) within"
+          2, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM grob),

-          3, 1, 0, (SCM context, SCM grob, SCM eltprop, SCM val),
-          "Do a single @code{\\override} or @code{\\revert} operation"
-          " in @var{context}.  The grob definition @var{grob} is extended"
-          " with @var{eltprop} (if @var{val} is specified) or reverted"
-          " (if unspecified).")
+          3, 1, 0, (SCM context, SCM grob, SCM property, SCM value),

-          3, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM name, SCM val),
-          "Set value of property @var{name} in context @var{context}"
-          " to @var{val}.")
+          3, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM property, SCM value),

-          (SCM context, SCM name),
-          "Unset value of property @var{name} in context @var{context}.")
+LY_DEFINE (ly_context_unset_property, "ly:context-unset-property",
+          2, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM property),

Regards,
Neil