[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line breaks and broken beams
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: line breaks and broken beams |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:56:42 +0100 (CET) |
Ping!
Werner
======================================================================
From: Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: line breaks and broken beams
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:08:31 +0200 (CEST)
>
>>> What's the reason that line breaks are by default forbidden if
>>> there is a broken beam crossing the bar line, and that you have to
>>> set the `breakable' flag manually to override it?
>>>
>>> BTW, it is very unpleasant that lilypond doesn't emit any kind of
>>> warning if it produces an overlong staff caused by that issue. It
>>> silently accumulates unbreakable bars and happily walks out of the
>>> right margin. I would consider this behaviour a bug.
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> (I've always felt this way, too.)
>
> Then let's drop the IMHO unfounded limitation of not breaking at beams
> crossing a barline.
>
>
> Werner
- Re: line breaks and broken beams,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Joe Neeman, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Joe Neeman, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Carl Sorensen, 2009/10/27
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/10/28
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, David Kastrup, 2009/10/28
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Nicolas Sceaux, 2009/10/28
- Re: line breaks and broken beams, Joe Neeman, 2009/10/28