Re: [frogs] Frog's Lament

[Chris Snyder]

Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:12:26PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> > We are not talking about explaining concepts to potential contributors
> > in private.  We are talking about explanations happening on the
> > developer list.  Those can be skimmed off into documentation, without
> > requiring all too much advance knowledge, because they were written for
> > the sake of people without all too much knowledge.
>
> I agree COMPLETELY.  Are you volunteering?
>
> > Perhaps it would be worth of another task master just to tick any such
> > article with the potential "more useful than existing docs" into a list,
>
> I agree COMPLETELY.  Are you volunteering?

It seems to me that such a list would best be maintained in a 
bug-tracker of some sort (though IMHO not the official issue tracker due 
to the noise it would generate).

Since I'm obviously not up to the task of attempting to fix code 
indentation, I'd like to volunteer for the task-master job, starting by 
setting up an issues tracker. My initial thought is that it would be 
prudent to set up another Google Code project where this tracker could 
be housed. If the PTB would instead prefer a different solution, let me 
know.

I'll wait for official guidance before proceeding.

-Chris