[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:45:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> On 12/17/09 9:53 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Of course, the results were quite different from what I half expected
>> to see.
>
> Yes. That difference is due to a pre-existing bug in the code. The
> consider_end check used the current duration, not the shortest
> duration in the beam.
That's one of the reasons why I dislike multiple responsible code paths
for the same task. They make it easier for bugs to stay in the dark.
"No bugs in my kitchen." "Did you check the crawlway?".
> That bug has now been fixed, and your example now beams the whole
> measure (as expected). Patch update soon to arrive.
Well, at least that places my contribution above the level of mere
noise. For now.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, (continued)
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, Trevor Daniels, 2009/12/18
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, David Kastrup, 2009/12/18
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/18
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, David Kastrup, 2009/12/18
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/18
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/18
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, Trevor Daniels, 2009/12/18
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/18
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, David Kastrup, 2009/12/18
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/19
- Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming,
David Kastrup <=