Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830

[Mark Polesky]

Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Actually, I don't think rebase is mentioned in the CG.  I
> can't see it on a quick trawl.  It should be, as a branch
> should be rebased before a patch is generated from it if
> master has been updated since the branch was created, else
> inadvertent reverts might be included.
>
> I'll have a closer look tomorrow to see what should be
> done.

Trevor, you should know that I might be restructuring the CG
quite a bit in the coming days...

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-12/msg00487.html

- Mark

p.s. why are all these replies coming in twice?