Release numbers [was Re: CG chapter 2, first draft]

[John Mandereau]

Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 12:31 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit :
> now that John's
> updated stable, I need to drop that work and start figuring out how to
> get GUB to make 2.12.3-2.

Why not releasing a 2.12.4 instead?  Revision numbers (third number of
the version number) are cheap, aren't they, and release numbers (-0, -1,
-2 etc.) are only supposed to denote a difference between different
builds of the *same* sources (i.e. same Git committish of LilyPond
sources branch), aren't they?  It must also save you work on GUB or at
least put down its priority so you can work on more urgent tasks.

Cheers,
John

signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée