[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: changes to Clef
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: changes to Clef |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:27:52 -0700 |
On 2/2/10 5:19 AM, "Valentin Villenave" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Schmidt <address@hidden> wrote:
>> They are commonly used by music educators and in instruction books. I'd even
>> say G, C and F clefs are less abstract than treble, alto or bass clefs as
>> they directly help to "decode" the score which is IMHO the main function of a
>> clef.
>
> If I may throw in my 2 cents:
>
> \clef treble
>
> is more consistent than
>
> \clef G
>
> when you're in "italiano.ly"-mode.
>
> I think it would be quite confusing for my pupils to have to use \clef
> G (in that case, we definitely should have an alias for \clef Sol).
We have two issues here:
1) What does LilyPond currently do? Answer: \clef C is the same as \clef
alto. This is now documented properly.
2) What should LilyPond do differently than it currently does, if anything?
Answer: This discussion should probably be part of GLISS.
Thanks,
Carl