Re: recently "pending" patches

[Graham Percival]

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Neil Puttock <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 4 March 2010 11:59, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Hopefully we can avoid having momentum on these issues stall, so
>> please take a look at the patches.
>
> Thanks for doing this, Graham.

All part of the job.  :)

> Alas, the first patch doesn't work (another weird regression testing
> glitch) and I'm still not satisfied with the second (though I hope to
> have a revised version which also fixes #999 sorted soon).

Ok.  I've removed the "patch" label from 305 and 943, but I've left
them "started" and owned by you.

Cheers,
- Graham