Re: Unicode cuteness

[Werner LEMBERG]

>>> For selfdescribing glyphs, is the following somewhat defensive
>>> approach sensible, or should 𝄞 be equivalent to the whole \clef
>>> "G" sequence?
>>>
>>> If the latter, it would need modifying the parser, right?  That
>>> would have the advantage that note lengths like 𝅘𝅥𝅰 could also be
>>> employed, pitches written like B𝄫, rests including length as 𝄽,
>>> and other niceties.
>>
>> I'm not a big fan of moving in this direction; your emails with
>> unicode included don't render properly on my email client.
> 
> Nor mine.  So I can't even understand the point you are trying
> to make.

Actually, I like David's patch.  It doesn't do any harm, and if
someone prefers to use it, it's there.


    Werner