[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Relative includes, regtests, Scheme and lp parser.
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Relative includes, regtests, Scheme and lp parser. |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:36:01 +0100 |
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:08:44PM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
>> While working on the regtests I've been wondering if we'd need a
>> regtest for the (awesome) behavior that Joe implemented in December
>> 2008 (commit 644008f18ec6780a812eee09ca549cf6b929037c requested by
>> issue #391).
I will, but there's more to it than the regtest thing: I was hoping
someone could answer my other two questions.
Cheers,
Valentin
- Relative includes, regtests, Scheme and lp parser., Valentin Villenave, 2010/03/18
- Re: Relative includes, regtests, Scheme and lp parser., Graham Percival, 2010/03/18
- Re: Relative includes, regtests, Scheme and lp parser.,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: Relative includes, regtests, Scheme and lp parser., Joe Neeman, 2010/03/19