Re: [PATCH] Issue 1046

[Marc Hohl]

Graham Percival schrieb:
> [...]
> > Why not just remove the string numbers?  Or eliminate the beams by changing
> > the rhythms?
> >     
>
> Oh, I thought that \deadNote required string numbers.  Yes, it
> definitely sounds as though this example should be simplified.
>   
You convinced me. The attached patch looks better IMHO.

Marc
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
>   

>From c494888746b97a2c1a63f1d913635dc9264fbe6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Hohl <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:18:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Issue 1046: better \deadNote example

---
 Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely 
b/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
index a39a809..e4df5e0 100644
--- a/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
+++ b/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
@@ -1481,12 +1481,12 @@ within normal and tablature staves:
 @lilypond[quote,ragged-right,verbatim]
 music = \relative c' {
   < a\3 \deadNote c\2 a'\1 >4
-  < b\3 \deadNote d\2 b'\1 >4
-  < c\3 \deadNote e\2 c'\1 >8
+  < b\3 \deadNote d\2 b'\1 >
+  < c\3 \deadNote e\2 c'\1 >
   \deadNotesOn
-  \times 2/3 { g16\3 b\2 e\1 }
+  \times 2/3 { g8 b e }
   \deadNotesOff
-  < a,\3 c\2 e\1 >4
+  < a,\3 c\2 e\1 >1
 }
 \new StaffGroup <<
   \new Staff {
-- 
1.5.4.3