[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rietveld review
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Rietveld review |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 14:42:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> On 5/4/10 12:46 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>
>>> This is a serious question I'd like to ask you. If you were the king
>>> of LilyPond, what would you establish as the workflow? I'd really
>>> like to hear your opinion.
>>
>> I'd not prohibit any work flow that can be maintained with single-line
>> git commands. That includes posting patch series (using
>> git-format-patch and git-mail) and private and public branches. There
>> are graphical tools for dealing with git branches and commits, there is
>> Emacs. The established development environment for Lilypond already is
>> a GNU/Linux machine (even if it is a virtual one), so the usual caveats
>> about git workflows on Windows machines don't apply.
>>
>
> For me, a requirement to use Emacs is a much bigger hurdle than the
> requirement to sign up for a gmail account.
I was not talking about a requirement, but an option.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Rietveld review, (continued)
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/06
- Re: Rietveld review, Christian Hitz, 2010/05/06
- Re: Rietveld review, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review,
David Kastrup <=
Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/03
Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures, Boris Shingarov, 2010/05/03