Re: completion disturbed by other staff (issue 1082)

[Neil Puttock]

On 14 May 2010 06:26, Benkő Pál <address@hidden> wrote:

> updated the patch fixing the issue and attached
> an example where the previous version failed.

LGTM.

A few minor nitpicks:

+      /*
+       note that note_dur may be strictly less than left_to_do_
+       (say, if left_to_do_ == 5/8)
+      */

This comment would be better placed first in this block.

+++ b/input/regression/completion-heads-polyphony-complex.ly

This test is very similar to the existing one, so it would be fine to
call it completion-heads-polyphony-2.ly.

+\version "2.12.0"

"2.13.22"

+Complex completion heads may be fooled by polyphony with a different rhythm.

Please change this to something which explains that the polyphony in
this test works properly.

Thanks,
Neil