Re: Auto-beaming infrastructure redo

[Hans Aberg]

On 3 Jul 2010, at 01:04, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> > If I throw in tuplets in this AST, setting them to 1:1, I get:
> >          +
> >          |
> >     (1:1, [(2, 1/8), (3, 1/8), +, (3, 1/8)])
> >                          |
> >                 (1:1, [(2, 1/8), ((3, 1/8), (2, 1/8)])
> >
> > That is, the tuplet p:q just appears as a pair (p, q) attached to the
> > list.
>
> But we don't need to introduce the tuplets in the LilyPond structure,
> because the p:q for tuplets is already handled by LilyPond, as far  
> as I can
> tell.  At least for right now, I think we can use a single  
> fundamental unit.

I think you may need to have the tuplets as a part of this structure  
in order to compute the correct beaming. Then the current flexible  
approach of LilyPond where they can be broken up in pieces might be a  
complication.

  Hans