Re: Modularity in lilypond

[Mike Solomon]

Understood.
Does this modularity thing seem eventually includable in lilypond?  I'm
finishing a piece for October 1 and would like to be consistent about the
way that I do the coding for my graphical notation: either it'll be done in
my git repository or as a module.  Obviously I'd like not to have to change
from one form to another afterwards, so if you think modularity seems like
it could become part of lilypond, I'll tackle my project from that angle.

Thanks!
~Mike


On 7/28/10 7:39 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:25:08PM +0200, Mike Solomon wrote:
>>     In doing this, I've realized that almost everything in Lilypond can be
>> made modular, which is a testament to how well it is put together.  David
>> had suggested modularity as an option before (perhaps others as well), and
>> there was a brief flurry of support for this idea: I'd now like to re-echo
>> it and work seriously on it to make it part of 2.14.
> 
> I don't think we should rearrange things for 2.14.  The plan for
> 2.15 is to start about 1 month after 2.14, and to start
> stabilizing and releasing 2.16 about 2 months after that.  Expect
> to merge this work in 2.15.
> 
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>