Re: Revised autobeam settings patch (issue1682049)

[n . puttock]

On 2010/07/13 15:02:56, Carl wrote:

> On 2010/07/11 23:31:50, Neil Puttock wrote:
> > beam-type ?

> I think not, because we're not talking about an argument to a function
call or
> an entry in an alist here.  We're talking about something that comes
from the
> music.  But I could be convinced otherwise.

I don't mind which, I was more concerned by the inconsistency: on the
next line, it says beam-type (and you use beam-type in the @itemize
block above, *before* you've presented the example for beaming rules
which uses beam-type1, beam-type2 etc.)

http://codereview.appspot.com/1682049/show