Re: questioning doc policy for @item

[Trevor Daniels]

Trevor Daniels wrote Saturday, November 20, 2010 8:29 AM
> Graham Percival Saturday, November 20, 2010 12:44 AM
>
>
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:55:26AM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > > CG 4.3.6 says:
> > > "Always put address@hidden on its own line, and separate
> > > consecutive items with a blank line."
> > >
> > > In fact, we literally have thousands of cases:
> > >
> > > $ git grep -c "address@hidden" |
> > >   sed -n 's/.*://p' |
> > >   awk '{total+=$0}END{print total}'
> > > 5103
> >
> > GDP only covered about 30% of the docs, and didn't strictly
> > enforce the doc policy even within those areas, that's not a good
> > reason to change the policy.
>
> +1.  In the GDP'd parts of the NR there are only 7 exceptions.
> (and in vocal none :)

Further, many if not all of the exceptions will be within 
@multitable,
where it is sensible to have @item foo.

Trevor