|
From: | James |
Subject: | Re: ragged variables - paper{} or layout{}? |
Date: | Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:25:04 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 |
Hello, On 02/12/2010 22:50, Mark Polesky wrote:
James wrote:If you search in the NR for ragged, you'll find it is pretty much interchangeably used in the paper{} block and the layout{} block. Is one correct and the other deprecated? Are both correct, and if so why?Something for GLISS?I don't think anything needs to be changed, but others may disagree.
I was really making the point from a 'documentation' point of view. We have some conventions in the doc that may not necessarily be THE only way of doing things - for example we ask for the use of { } in certain cases that are not *required* but are a documentation convention.
So I was suggesting that perhaps in GLISS we decide if we put these variables in \layout or \paper (or whatever).
James
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |