lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Doc: More NR and LM additions based on user emails (issue3705042)


From: percival . music . ca
Subject: Re: Doc: More NR and LM additions based on user emails (issue3705042)
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:05:27 +0000


http://codereview.appspot.com/3705042/diff/1/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely
File Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/3705042/diff/1/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely#newcode2114
Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely:2114: objects to note heads, if
you remove the @code{Note_heads_engraver}
I'm not convinced that the comma is grammatical.  How do you feel about
semicolons?

http://codereview.appspot.com/3705042/diff/1/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely
File Documentation/notation/repeats.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/3705042/diff/1/Documentation/notation/repeats.itely#newcode150
Documentation/notation/repeats.itely:150: @rprogram{An extra staff
appears}.  Do not place bar checks outside
Could this be in a separate @warning?  I'd rather not have two totally
distinct warnings in the same box.

I also think it's a bit wordier than it needs to be -- I really want to
keep warnings short, otherwise they lose their power.  How about
"Bar checks must be placed @emph{inside} the braces of each alternate
block." ?  ok, that's not quite the same thing (it says that you *must*
use bar checks)... but please try to think of a reformulation along
those lines.

http://codereview.appspot.com/3705042/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]