[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:46:19 +0100 (CET) |
> next thing is to decide what the output of { c32 c[ c] c64 c[ c] }
> should be. Currently the stems of unbeamed notes are lenghtened to
> middle line only ("current output.png"). In my opinion this looks
> weird, i'd suggest something like "suggested output.png".
Again, I think that the stems of the beamed notes are too long; in
both cases, I would move the beams down one staff space...
Werner
- shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/09
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Trevor Daniels, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/11