Re: PATCH - DOC: Added @knownissue to NR for fingering

[Graham Percival]

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:00:27PM +0000, James Lowe wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >Stupid question: since I can see no use for following a fingering with a
> >digit, why don't we just change the parser appropriately?  _If_ there is
> >some use for numbers greater than 10 (apart from the current situation,
> >button accordion fingerings may need to be underlined in order to
> >indicate helper rows, and one could likely just put something in the
> >engraver which does this for numbers greater 10, deducting 10 in the
> >process), rather than making yet-another-LSR-snippet, we could just
> >allow larger numbers.

Sounds good to me!

> Well there's no rush for this specific patch, so it can wait for a while
> in case anyone wants to chime in/add some code change.
>
> I agree that another LSR is not ideal, but we need to do something I think.

I don't think we need a LSR snippet; let's just add the
@knownissue now.  Unless David thinks he can make a patch in a few
days...?

Cheers,
- Graham