[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Mar 2011 05:08:34 +0100 (CET) |
>> As written earlier, I see absolutely no reason why the stems for
>> the beamed 128th must be that long. IMHO, they could be moved down
>> one staff space. Am I missing something?
>
> Maybe it's done in order to visually separate beams with staff
> symbol. 128th beam consists of five lines, so it could blend with
> staff undesireably.
I rather believe that noone has specifically considered this case.
Werner
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, (continued)
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Trevor Daniels, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/10
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff, Janek Warchoł, 2011/03/11
- Re: shortened flags affair, part 5 - length of notes extending far from staff,
Werner LEMBERG <=