[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:31:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:23:25AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> I won't add any such an item to the GOP policy list since I won't
> endorse announcing one thing in CG while adhering to a different policy
> in reality.
Ok, I added it myself:
86fa50596945324d6b5ab95f8fb018ab69a4e633
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, (continued)
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, Graham Percival, 2011/04/08
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, David Kastrup, 2011/04/08
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, Graham Percival, 2011/04/08
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, David Kastrup, 2011/04/09
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, Graham Percival, 2011/04/10
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, David Kastrup, 2011/04/10
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, Graham Percival, 2011/04/10
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, David Kastrup, 2011/04/10
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, Graham Percival, 2011/04/11
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?, David Kastrup, 2011/04/11
- Re: Policy about not-yet-regression tests?,
Graham Percival <=