Re: Doc: NR rewrite of 3.2 Titles and Headers (issue4124056)

[pkx166h]

On 2011/05/04 17:08:39, Carl wrote:
> Looks mostly good to me.

> Carl


http://codereview.appspot.com/4124056/diff/32001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
> File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):


http://codereview.appspot.com/4124056/diff/32001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode667
> Documentation/notation/input.itely:667: Text fields left unset in a
> @code{\header} block are replaced with
> This paragraph has three different ideas -- null markups, piece and
opus, and
> forcing titles to start on a new page.

> They should probably be separated into three different paragraphs.


http://codereview.appspot.com/4124056/diff/32001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode937
> Documentation/notation/input.itely:937:
> Need @seealso for the @ref in this node -- Title blocks explained,
Default
> layout of book and score title blocks,.


http://codereview.appspot.com/4124056/diff/32001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode987
> Documentation/notation/input.itely:987: @end lilypond
> Need @seealso here, with all of the @ref in this node (Default layout
of book
> and title blocks).

Carl, I have done this now (and the one above). We only really focused
on the 'first half' of the text that Mark did (and also hammer out all
the @lilypond settings too).

I am going to close this issue - I left it open only because I
remembered you wanted some additions that were not going to be in the
main patch, and open a new one with these and other changes. I also
wanted to make some more 'edits' to this text once the major changes
were done to keep some layout and style consistency.

http://codereview.appspot.com/4124056/