[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?
From: |
Benkő Pál |
Subject: |
Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:09:28 +0200 |
> Maybe i'll write something myself next week, especially if the result
> would be included in Lily (i mean, not as a helper function in the
> docs, but built in Lily). If you could write a very small example of
> how to use key signature in scheme code it would help me much - i can
> handle the algorithm, but writing scheme code is still some problem to
> me.
look at scm/modal-transforms.scm. there's a scale parameter to some
functions; those are called from ly/music-functions-init.ly from functions
(e.g. modalTranspose) that still take scale as parameter. there are
examples in NR 1.1.2 Modal transformations. the scale is a set;
you would iterate through the music and replace each note for which
you find an enharmonic equivalent in the scale.
now as I write this, it feels easier than I thought, maybe I'll find time
enough this weekend to do it.
p
- enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/06/16
- Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?, Benkő Pál, 2011/06/16
- Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/06/16
- Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?,
Benkő Pál <=
- Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?, Benkő Pál, 2011/06/20
- Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2011/06/21
- Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/06/22
- Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?, Benkő Pál, 2011/06/23
- Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/06/26
- Re: enharmonic problem with \transpose - should we modify it?, Benkő Pál, 2011/06/26