[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:03:02 -0600 |
On 6/22/11 3:53 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:34:42PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote:
>> 2011/6/22 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>>> There are plenty of differences. If you get the git diff command
>>> to work, you'll see.
>>
>> It still doesn't work. I'm in top source directory, on branch master
>> which is up to date (and git diff origin/master shows no differencies)
>> and when i call
>> git diff origin/dev/gperciva-fixcc origin/dev/gperciva-astyle
>> i get the same error:
>>
>> fatal: ambiguous argument 'origin/dev/gperciva-fixcc': unknown
>> revision or path not in the working tree.
>
> Ah wait, are you using lilydev (or did you follow the CG git
> instructions)? If you got the master branch specifically instead
> of doing a general git clone, then you won't have those branches.
>
> The simplest way to get them is to do a git clone. There's a way
> to add specific branches to your existing git tree, so if you feel
> like hunting around through git docs and blogs and stuff, I'm sure
> you can find it there. Actually, I vaguely recall that there's
> something in the CG about adding branches... in the old days, we
> had web/ on a separate branch, so we needed instructions about
> that.
>
>
> I suppose we should update the CG git instructions to use git
> clone rather than the master-branch-only method.
Perhaps. I have resisted doing a clone because I don't want to stuff my git
repository full. But I may be stupid to behave that way.
For the short term, you can do
git pull origin dev/gperciva-fixcc
git pull origin dev/gperciva-astyle
to get those branches.
HTH,
Carl
- GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Graham Percival, 2011/06/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Keith OHara, 2011/06/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Jan Warchoł, 2011/06/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Graham Percival, 2011/06/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Jan Warchoł, 2011/06/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Graham Percival, 2011/06/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Jan Warchoł, 2011/06/25
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Graham Percival, 2011/06/25
- Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Jan Warchoł, 2011/06/25
Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Trevor Daniels, 2011/06/22
Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Hans Aberg, 2011/06/22
Re: GOP-PROP 3: C++ formatting, Valentin Villenave, 2011/06/25
Message not available