[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Current state of automatic footnotes. (issue4580041)
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Current state of automatic footnotes. (issue4580041) |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:03:09 +0200 |
On Jun 26, 2011, at 11:26 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2011, at 6:38 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>
>> On 2011/06/25 07:15:39, J_lowe wrote:
>>> I get an error/seg fault when I try to make:
>>
>> I can confirm this.
>>
>>
>
> Fixed. I had accidentally kept "annotation-whiteout" in balloon.cc whereas I
> had scrubbed it in all the other files.
>
> One problem is that, after internals.texi is built, I get:
>
> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*
> Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> I'm not sure what I did to make this happen. It doesn't interfere w/ the
> compilation process, so the patch is still reviewable, but it'd need to be
> found and scrubbed before being pushed.
> I'm guessing that I'm forgetting to unprotect something that I'm creating.
> If anyone runs across something in my code that creates new events/probs in
> an unusual way (i.e. a clone) or anything else that'd cause this, please let
> me know!
>
Just a follow-up: I ran all of the footnote related regtests and this error did
not come up. So it may arise from something else.
Cheers,
MS
- Current state of automatic footnotes. (issue4580041), mtsolo, 2011/06/06
- Re: Current state of automatic footnotes. (issue4580041), bordage . bertrand, 2011/06/18
- Re: Current state of automatic footnotes. (issue4580041), percival . music . ca, 2011/06/21
- Re: Current state of automatic footnotes. (issue4580041), mtsolo, 2011/06/22
- Re: Current state of automatic footnotes. (issue4580041), n . puttock, 2011/06/22
- Re: Current state of automatic footnotes. (issue4580041), pkx166h, 2011/06/25
- Re: Current state of automatic footnotes. (issue4580041), percival . music . ca, 2011/06/25